Regulatory attention is focused on the presence of certain man-made substances in the environment at trace levels (parts per trillion or ppt). The science regarding whether these trace levels cause harm is not well developed. However, there is growing awareness that some of these substances are detectable in nearly all U.S. blood samples, and they are commonly present in drinking water resources. The drive to apply the “precautionary principle” to these concerns by moving to regulate the substances to low parts per trillion, ahead of the science on exposure and dose, is potentially disruptive to communities and businesses because the substances involved are so ubiquitous at the levels set or proposed.
Primary among the substances of emerging concern are PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a group of chemicals that have been widely used since the 1940s. The PFAS term includes a wide array of substances with different structures and properties, but all involving some number of carbon-fluorine bonds — said to be among the strongest of chemical bonds. Hundreds of these substances have been incorporated into a variety of products, such as firefighting foams, stain and water repellent fabrics, product packaging such as microwave popcorn bags, non-stick cookware, personal care products such as dental floss, adhesives, latex paint, metal plating, wire manufacturing, industrial surfactants and many other products and uses.
USEPA and various state agencies, are taking steps to better understand and address the presence of PFAS in the environment, particularly in drinking water. Many PFAS are, by design, stable compounds that can remain in the environment for a very long time without breaking down. Only a few of the PFAS substances have been studied for their human health impacts. To date, PFOA and PFOS, the two substances most widely used and most often detected in the environment, are the PFAS substances that have been most studied.
In 2016, EPA issued a Health Advisory Level (“HAL”) for PFOA and PFOS of 70 parts per trillion in drinking water. The HAL is an advisory level only and not a binding drinking water standard. In February 2019, EPA issued a PFAS Action Plan to guide the agency’s efforts to better understand PFAS and reduce any risks associated with PFAS exposure. EPA’s efforts at implementing the plan are ongoing.
Many states are developing and implementing their own PFAS action plans.
New Jersey got out ahead of most of the country in regulating PFAS. In January 2018, New Jersey issued a specific groundwater quality criterion of 10 parts per trillion (“ppt”) for PFNA (after its November 2015 Interim Specific Groundwater Quality Criterion for PFNA was struck down by the Superior Court) and adopted a drinking water maximum contaminant level (“MCL”) for PFNA of 13 ppt in September 2018. (Upon the issuance of the MCL, the New Jersey groundwater quality criterion for PFNA became 13 ppt as well.) By March 2019, New Jersey issued interim specific groundwater quality criteria for PFOA and PFOS of 10 ppt, and in April 2019, proposed drinking water maximum contaminant levels for PFOA and PFOS of 13 ppt and 14 ppt. PFNA is now a New Jersey hazardous substance and PFOA and PFOS are proposed hazardous substances.
Largely in response to PFAS detected in Montgomery and Bucks Counties, in September 2018, Pennsylvania formed a PFAS Action Team and PADEP has developed a PFAS sampling plan to test public water systems across the Commonwealth for six PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpA, and PFBS.) In addition, Pennsylvania’s Act 2 incorporates the USEPA’s HAL as statewide health based standards.
This evolving area of the law can pose unique challenges for companies, water suppliers, and property owners. Fox Rothschild attorneys are actively engaged for clients on PFAS issues at the national level, as well as in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and have the necessary experience to help clients navigate these challenges. Watch this Blog and visit our Environmental Practice page to learn more. (https://www.foxrothschild.com/environmental/)
Additional information can be found here:
- EPA’s PFAS Site
- EPA’s Site-Specific PFAS Information
- includes information on certain military bases, as well as sites in several states
- EPA’s PFAS Action Plan
- ATSDR Site
- Includes health information and information on ATSDR studies and assessments
- ITRC Site
- Includes Fact Sheets on: Naming Conventions and Physical/Chemical Properties, Regulations, Guidance and Advisories, History and Use, Environmental Fate and Transport, Site Characterization Considerations, Sampling precautions and Lab Analytical Methods, Remediation Technologies, and on AFFF
- New Jersey DEP’s Emerging Contaminants Site
- PADEP PFAS Site
- PADEP PFC Information Sheet
- PA Department of Health PFC Information Sheet
ATSDR – Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
CWS – Community Water System
HAL – Health Advisory Level
PFAS – The family of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
PFCA – Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acid
PFBS – Perfluorobutane Sulfonic Acid
PFBA – Perfluorobutanoic Acid
PFHpA – Perfluoroheptanoic Acid
PFHxS – Perfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid
PFNA – Perfluorononanoic Acid
PFOA – Perfluorooctanoic Acid
PFOS – Perfluorooctane Sulfonate